" Blumenthal, as the Safe Technology advocacy community knows, famously said in 2019 that Telecom was “flying blind” - after witnesses dropped the bombshell that Wireless had “zero safety testing”"
For anyone new to this, the industry's “zero safety testing” admission does not mean wireless is an untested technology. The effects of wireless signals (microwaves) on biological life have been studied extensively since WW2, with much of the tests carried out by the military. The effects are well documented and conclusive: it's toxic to all biological life in numerous different ways.
The industry is well aware that wireless is not a viable technology (in the same way the asbestos isn't) and that is why they refuse to fund safety tests.
" Blumenthal, as the Safe Technology advocacy community knows, famously said in 2019 that Telecom was “flying blind” - after witnesses dropped the bombshell that Wireless had “zero safety testing”"
For anyone new to this, the industry's “zero safety testing” admission does not mean wireless is an untested technology. The effects of wireless signals (microwaves) on biological life have been studied extensively since WW2, with much of the tests carried out by the military. The effects are well documented and conclusive: it's toxic to all biological life in numerous different ways.
The industry is well aware that wireless is not a viable technology (in the same way the asbestos isn't) and that is why they refuse to fund safety tests.
*